Thursday, June 11, 2009

The End.

I enjoyed reading all the articles and making a blog!

Go Envi-Sci!

Japan's Lackluster Goal

June 10,09

Environmentalists and industry officials are criticizing Japan's goal of reducing greenhouse glasses emitted into the air. The country announced that by 2020, it plan to reduce emissions 15 from 2005 levels. Prime Minister Taro Also announced the 2020 levels will be 8 percent below its 1990 levels. Critics had hoped high target would persuade countries like China and India in reducing their emissions but Japan's plans seem to be lacking for the developed country. Japan has struggled to meet their emission levels as their greenhouse gas emissions increased 9 percent from 1990 levels. Although it emits less emissions than other economies, the second to largest economy in the world is fifth in global emission rankings behind the U.S., China, Russian, and India.
I was surprised that Japan did not set a higher goal to reduce emissions. I think in such a developed country, they should look forward to improving the environment setting a precedent for other countries. However, maybe it will increase its goal in the future. Everyone needs to help out the environment even if it might not be an easy task!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/world/asia/11emit.html?ref=earth

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Another Unsatisfied Group

June 8,2008

An environment group is suing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the failure in limiting the transmission of air pollution across state lines in the West. WildEarth Guardians are claiming that states like New Mexico and California do not have plans that address the interstate transport of ozone pollution. They are concerned that the pollution would cause an increase in the amount of smog, and soot in the air. The lawsuit states the EPA is two years late in preparing the plans. The EPA has not reviewed the lawsuit yet.
Although I have never heard of the WildEarth Guardians, if their argument is valid, the lawsuit might bring some positive changes. The EPA can ennact laws that would decrease the amount of air pollution those states emit. I wonder how the EPA will respond to the lawsuit and if they will actually go to court.


http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2009-06-08-epa-lawsuit_N.htm

Monday, June 8, 2009

Benevolent Beavers?

June 8,09

In Massachusetts, people are unhappy with the beavers who are causing their town to flood. the dams the beaver builds clog culverts and causes septic tanks to overflow. Although residents are breaking them down, the beavers are rebuilding the dams quickly. Although some people want to remove the beavers, doing so might disrupt the ecosystem and cause an abundance of black bears, moose, and turkeys. A large amount of money is needed to fix the problems the beavers are causing.
Although the beavers are causing a lot of troubles for the residents of Massachusetts, I do not think there is much that can be done that will not upset the ecosystem's natural balance. The beavers are just trying to live and I don't think they intend to cause flooding. I think engineers can figure out some way to lower the water levels.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/science/earth/09beaver.html?ref=science

The Award for the Most Efficient City Goes To...

June 8,09

Although San Francisco has the highest recycling rate in the country, it is still trying to reach it's goal of diverting 75 of its waste from landfills. To do so, a new mandatory recycling and composting law was proposed. The law would require residential and commercial building owners to sign up for recycling and composting services or be fined 500 dollars. An additional fine would be given to those who put recyclable or compostable waste in regular trash bins.
Although the new law would increase the amount of waste that will be recycled or composted, it will require authorities to make sure people are following the law. However, if successful, San Francisco would have a 90 percent recycling and composting rate, which would be very beneficial to the environment. I think more cities should have a law requiring recycling too.

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/08/tougher-recycling-rules-for-san-francisco/

Belching Cows

June 4,09

Yogurt company Stoneyfield Farms is experimenting with cows and determing if a change in diet will lead to less methane being belched out. The cows are fed plants like alfalfa and faxseed.Methane output has dropped 18 percent and the cows are healthier with shinier coats. Methane emitted from cows are accounts for 2 percent fo the countries emissionof heat-trapping gasses. However, the new diet costs more than the regular corn and soy used.
I never knew cows emit methane into the environment. Stoneyfield's Farms' efforts to decrease the amount of methane seems to be effective. The organic yogurt company is increasing its efforts to make the company more eco-friendly. Yay!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/05/us/05cows.html?ref=earth

Shnazzy British Houses

May 24,09

Houses in Britain are going to be super efficient. Starting 2016, all new houses will be zero-carbon in efforts to meet the goal of cutting 80 percent of carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 as required in the Climate Change Act. Architects and construction companies are developing energy efficient structures, solar panels, and community heat-sharing systems. However, homeowners may not want to pay 20,000 euros more for a more eco-friendly home.
If I can afford an eco-friendly house, I would definitely one. Britain's new housing plan is a huge process, but it is a good step towards helping the environment. I think by 2050, carbon dioxide emissions will decrease as long as plans like Britain continue to develop.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/business/energy-environment/25iht-rboghome.html?_r=1

A Farewell to Old Refrigerants

May 22, 09

New refrigerants will be used for windows, sir conditioning systems, heat pumps, and chillers starting Jan,1, 2010. Rebates are offered to replace the old refrigerants are old systems are not required to be thrown away. Freon 22 has been used for refrigerant for years, but when it is released into the atmosphere, it destroys t he ozone layer. The new coolants will be built better, greater energy efficiency, save money, and have lower leaks. however, the new systems will still contribute to global warming since it distributes heat into the atmosphere.
The new refrigerents are definitely more environmentally friendly. Schools, offices, and homes should get rid of their old systems and relpace them. I think the rebate is also helpful in helping people afford the replacement. I think Roxbury can use some upgrades.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/realestate/24posting.html?_r=1

The Bottled Water Problem

May 19,09

Governor David Paterson and water companies like nestle has filed a lawsuit against imposing a deposit fee on water bottles. The law on water bottles requires distributors to collect 5 cents for each bottle of water. The money is then redeemed by consumers when they recycle the bottles. A universal product code label would be needed to added to bottles sold in New York. This law would encourage recycling of water bottles, but they companies are suing that it is not fair that beverages with sugar will not have a fee.
Although recycling water bottles would save a lot of of plastic and prevent landfills from being filled up quickly, I think many companies would start adding a little sugar to their bottles just to avoid the fee. Therefore, i think the new law would work at first, but then become ineffective. If all bottled drinks require a fee, recycling efforts would probably improve.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/nyregion/20bottle.html?_r=1

Changes for the Hudson River

May 15,09

Cleanup of the Superfund site of the Hudson River started with a scoop of mud being extracted by dredge guided by a computer. PCBs are going to be removed round the clock six days a week from May to October. The sediments are then transported by freight trains to a hazardous landfill in Texas. The cause of the Superfund Site is from two General Electric factories that contaminated the land for three decades before PCBs are banned. Dredging of the 197 mile land is suppose to be continued until 2015.
If there are no delays, the cleanup of the Hudson River will probably be completed by 2015. It is important to cleanup hazardous materials from the environment and I am glad to hear this cleanup is finally starting. The Hudson River is a defining and important landmark of New York, so I hope the plan succeeds.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/16/science/earth/16dredge.html?_r=1

Toxic Ships

May 14, 09

A new regulation on recycling ships was reached after delegates from 64 nations met in Hong Kong. The International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships requires ships to have updates on hazardous materials that are carried in their years of service. This information is shared with recycling fact ores and the workers will have protective gear so they can dispose the hazardous materials. Disposal procedures and emergency response plans are also required of the centers. However, enforcement of the policy is decided by the nation's government since there is no international agency to regulate it.
Although an international agency would help enforce the new regulations, the agreement between the nations is going to make a difference in hazardous material disposal. Now, toxins are less likely to be leaked and harm the environment. I hope more nations would sign the pact.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/business/energy-environment/15ship.html?_r=1

A Nickle A Bag?

May 13,09

Lawmakers in Connecticut are considering a tax on plastic shopping bags. 5 cents would be charged in hopes that it wil encourage people to use reusable bags and provide revenue for the state. However, critics argue that the new tax will not defer people from using plastic bags and it wil be more effective to implements rewards rather than taxes in this economy.Retailers in Connecticut are split in support of the tax.
Although a tax would help the government earn money, it might not be very effective in helping hte environment. Even if people stop using plastic bags, they will probably ask for paper bags. I also think a reward system would be more suitable because people would like to earn money for helping the environment admist the recession. But, the question is, where would the money come from? A very interesting article that makes you think.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/nyregion/connecticut/17bagsct.html?_r=1

New Golfing Bags

May 3. 2009

Wilson Staff's Eco-Carry may be the next big thing in golf. The gold bag is an environmentally friendly bag made from plastic bottles. 100 percent recyclable, it uses 12 gallon-sexed bottles that are crushed into flakes, made into fibers, and then woven. The production of these bags release 70 percent less carbon dioxide compared to regular bags. In addition, the bag comes in an earthy, moss color and has all the functions of a regular golf bag.
I never knew you can make yarn from plastic. This bag may lead to more bags made from plastic. What an eco-friendly alternative. I kind of wish I golf and need a new bag!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/04/sports/golf/04parbags.html?_r=1

Steel Birds Using Less Fuel

April 29,09

Airlines are hoping to reduce their fuel use. By using less fuel for travel, they can save money and reduce carbon emissions. Aviation contributes 2 percent of the greenhouse gasses. If airlines can save six percent of fuel on all flights, 90 million gallons of fuel can be saved yearly and reduce 1.9 billion pounds of carbon emissions. By using satellites and global positioning systems planes can fly more direct routes and use less fuel. However, changing the systems would take time.
Since commercial aviation relies on fuel prices to succeed, reducing fuel use would help them greatly. It is a added benefit that using less fuel would decrease the amount of greenhouse gasses emitted into the air. By using more direct routes, people will also be able to reach their destination faster. I wonder if the plane I'm catching to Disney World is reducing its fuel...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/business/energy-environment/30aviation.html

Goodbye Trays!

April 28,2009

Colleges all over the country are disposing cafeteria trays forever in efforts to reduce water use, food waste, and save money. Some colleges are holding "trayless Tuesdays", 126 are removing the trays, and others are installing solar panels and composting waste in efforts to promote environmentalism. However, going trayless causes more traffic in cafeterias as students return to lines more often for more food. But, learning to hold your food and drink in one hand while talking with the other can be a useful skills for cocktail parties in the future!
Disposing trays is a good way to conserve resources and save energy. I predict more and more colleges and maybe even workplaces and schools will adopt the trayless method of serving. I hope my college follows the trend and stops using trays too. But, I do wonder, how really clumsy people are balancing their food.... ; )

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/nyregion/29tray.html

Funding for Superfund

April 25,2009

600 million dollars in stimulus money is being spent on Superfund cleanup sites like the Vineland
Chemical Company in New Jersey. Since the Superfund tax expired in 1995, the program has been under financed. As many sites do not have a responsible party who can pay for the cleanup, taxpayer money is being used. President Barack Obama is plans to restore the Superfund tax from chemical and oil companies. This would provide a billion dollars in revenue. 50 out of 1500 Superfund sites are chosen to receive the stimulus money for cleanup.
I think a tax should be reinstated since chemical and oil companies are the causes of many Superfund sites. In New Jersey, there are a lot of Superfund sites, and I hope other sites in addition to Vineland can be cleaned up quickly. Some people would oppose using tax money, but if that is the quickest and only way of funding the cleanups, I think it is acceptable.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/26/science/earth/26superfund.html?_r=1

Recycle!

My public service announcement photostory for recycling!

Revamping Buildings in NY

April 22,2009

New York Mayor Michael Bloomburg and City Council Speaker Christine Quinn are proposing new laws that will require thousands of old buildings to upgrade. This proposal would reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. 2.9 billion dollars will be invested in the improvements by 2022 and 2,000 new jobs will be created. This program, beginning in 2013 would save property owners 740 million dollars a year, but improvements would only be mandatory if lower energy bills in the the next five years meet the spendings. in NY, buildings emit 80 percent of the city's carbon dioxide levels and energy costs cost 15 billion dollars year. 16 million dollars in energy efficiency and conservation grants in the federal stimulus package would be used to prime a revolving-loan fund.
By upgrading the buildings in New York (there's a lot!), less energy would be used and the environment would be more protected. I think Bloomburg's plan would work and help the city's unemployment rate. Although there will be opposition to his plan, I think the new changes would be beneficial in the short and long term. Go Bloomburg!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/science/earth/22green.html

Saving the Coral Reef!

April 14, 2009

In the Sekisei Lagoon in Japan, divers are drilling holes and inserting ceramic disks into the holes in an effort to save Japan's largest coral reef. The goal of this long and costly project is to perfect methods that can be used to save reefs from overfishing, pollution, and global warming. Since 2005, around 13,000 pieces of coral has been replanted. However, from the coral planted in 2005, only a third has survived. The ceramic disks help young coral to take root and is more efffective than past methods of using wire and nails. Next year, an estimated 10,000 coral pieces will be planted.
This was such a fascinating article as Japan's plan to save the coral reef will make the reef more colorful and suitable for many organisms to live in. The process is labor intensive and costly, but I think it is worth it because it will help the environment a lot. It will probably take many, many years for the whole reef to be completed, but I am looking forward to good news in the future.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/15/world/asia/15coral.html

New Rules Cause Problems For Fishermen

April 8,2008

New fishing regulations has got professional fisherman worried as fewer summer flounder are being caught. Restrictions from the State Department of Environmental Conservation were based on overfishing and fish stock data from the Nationoal Marine Fisheries Service. The new rules might hurt the flounder, or fluke popuation because new size requirements means that smaller fish would be thrown back into the water and die. Since most fluke larger than 18 inches long are female, the productivity of the water may also decrease. As more people are catching large flukes, which are relatively easy to catch, fishermen are worried that they will lose their business.
I think the government should reimburse or protect the fishermen. It is important for the fishermen to fish for a living, especially in the recession. If nothing is done to reduce the uneven catching of the fluke, the diversity of fish can change for the worse. I hope the fish and fishermen can be saved.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/nyregion/long-island/12fishli.html

A Smaller Deal

April 1,2009

As a result of the recession, Floraida's 1.34 billion dollar deal to buy 180,000 acres to restore the everglades has been reduced. Instead, 72,500 acres would be bought for 530 million dollars from United States Sugar Corporation. The proposal has yet to be approved by the South Florida Water Management District and the board of United States Sugar. This would prevent the land to be used for mining adn developemnt. The deal would preserve jobs, land used for citrus would be avalibale for waste water treatment and storage, revive the water flow between Lake Okachobee and the Everglades.
By buying the land, the Everglades can be preserved. Although the deal is smaller than what was orignally planned, I think that in this economy, it is stll a wise move. I hope the plan gets approved because it would help the environment and the people who work there.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/us/02everglades.html

Lights Off!

March 29, 09

On Saturday March 28, people turned off their lights all over the country for an hour. This was done to conserve energy and make statement about climate change. Places like Hong Kong, Paris, and Las Vegas turned off important landmarks. Advocates hope that through the event, people would consider a treaty on global warming and lowering greenhouse gas emissions. People all over the world admired the drastic change in the bright lights and watched as parts of the world turned dark.
This was such a cool event. I did not know it even existed until this year. Turning the lights off conserved a lot of energy and raised awareness of energy use. It is a great idea and i'm glad people all over the world particiapted. I wish I was in Times Square to see the lights off!

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/nyregion/29lights.html

Uh Oh, More Carbon Dioxide Emissions

September 26, 2008

Carbon dioxide emissions are accelerating and close to the highest scenarios considered by the Intergovernmental Panal on Climate Change. Poor, developing countries lead in the output of global emissions. This is because of the explosive economic expansion in the burning of coal and manufacturing cement. Oceans and forests that usually suck in more than half of the gas emitted each year have declined in efficiency have not kept up with the rising emissions. If carbon dioxide keeps increasing and the natural "sink"weaken, more global warming may occur.
Alternative fuels should be used so there would be less carbon dioxide emitted into the air.
Although it is great that countries are advancing, manufacturing and burning coal harms the environment. If other countries help the developing countries fund alternative fuel resources, carbon dioxide emissions can decrease. If not, global warming will worsen and the world would become more polluted!

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/26/co2-flow-speeds-up-poor-countries-now-lead/?scp=1&sq=flows%20speeds%20up%20poor%20countries&st=cse

Gray Wolves Back On The Endangered List?

September 24, 2008

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service is asking federal judge Molloy to vacate the decision of removing the gray wolves from the endangered species list. The lawsuit said the plan to control the wolf population relied too much on killing and that the wolve's genetics are not all understood. The reconsideration of the listing was not due to the decline in the wolf population in the Rockies. The hunting of wolvbes in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming is delayed until the reevaluation is complete, but state and federal agents in those states can kill problem wolves that threaten livestock.
I think more consideration is needed to determine if the wolves should be put back on the list. Although killing wolves is unfair, it is necessary to get rid of those that threaten livestock. This was an intersting article since it made me realize that putting certain animals on the endangered species list is controversial.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/24/us/24wolves.html?scp=1&sq=agency%20to%20reconsider%20taking%20gray%20wolves&st=cse

Less Ice Leaving the Artic!

September 17, 2008

The ice cloking the Artic Ocean have retreated less than it did last summer. Despite the decrease, the icea was still 33% below the average and the trend continues to forming an ice-free Artic Ocean in a few decades. Global watming contributes to the ice retreats in addition to the natural variations of Artic winds and cloud cover. Polar bears, who under the Endangered Species Act are affected by the ice retreat. It is hard to see the summer ice returning and in the long run, more open water may occur despite the decreased recession.

It is good news that less ice is retreating in the Artic. Although there isn't a complete stop to the retreat, the slow down would help the animals there survive. Scientists should research reasons why the retreat has declined and figure ways to help the environment. I hope the polar bears and all the other animals are also celebrating the good news! =)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/17/science/earth/17ice.html?scp=1&sq=artic%20ocean%20ice%20retreats%20less%20than%20last%20year&st=cse